The Ankler

David Ellison’s AI Plan: Make a Movie 20 Times. But First…

Skydance’s chief says the tech can test 15-20 versions of a film. But with $80B in debt, the revolution starts in the back office

Erik Barmack

I wrote about what the great AI freakout means for Hollywood, AI and reality TV and A24’s deal with Google DeepMind.


Skydance’s Paramount-Warners combo may be Hollywood’s most aggressive attempt yet to turn AI into a real-world studio operating system, a fantasy/dystopia (depending on your world view) of automation. And David Ellison’s own vision — in his own words — goes well beyond using the tech to speed up spreadsheets or automate HR.

Earlier this year, speaking at a finance conference in March with one of his own investors and board members, RedBird’s Gerry Cardinale, Ellison suggested that AI could allow Paramount to make multiple versions of a movie, test them with audiences and learn quickly what works. “If you can make the movie 15 times, 20 times, get that audience feedback, you’re going to be able to tell better stories that entertain your audience,” he said.

Of course, who can blame him for being an AI evangelist? His dad is literally betting it all on the tech, pouring Oracle’s billions into the data centers that power it, and that same fortune is what’s propping up Skydance’s balance sheet. And with the boulder of $80 billion in debt that Wall Street absolutely hates rolling downhill toward Skydance’s bottom line every second of every day, any tool that can help free up Sisyphus… well, bring on the “efficiencies.”

A Skydance rep declined to comment.

So AI-as-tastemaker is the radical end state of a 21st century studio that every union and director will oppose. The transformation inside the company, though, likely starts somewhere far less cinematic — but with equal impact on its workers.

Don’t stop here

Get the rest of this story — and the scoops and intelligence Hollywood reads first.

Already a subscriber?

Comments

  1. DarkOzTheNovel

    This argument makes no sense. AI isn’t going to spit out 20 different versions of a movie and then Paramount goes with the best one. This is going to be 15 teams of people overseeing 15 different versions using AI.

    That means more jobs.

    Paramount needs copyright to maintain control of their IP. That means human input. They aren’t going to have 14 public domain AI versions possibly be running around while they work on that 15th on that passed audience testing.

    You are not using logic here. This is going to add jobs, not take away. While films can be tested before the major money is spent.

    It’s a really good idea IMO.

Only Ankler All Access subscribers can comment

Already a subscriber?

Related Stories