The Ankler

PREVIEW Pow! Zaslav vs. Hastings ๐ŸฅŠ

Analyzing two competing visions for entertainment’s future

You know whatโ€™s fun about the streaming wars?

We have a lot of strategy to talk about.

I mean, a job/title like mine (โ€œentertainment strategistโ€) couldnโ€™t really have existed in the 2000s, could it? Most of the major players in entertainment had the same strategy: make lots of movies, then make money in theaters, home entertainment and finally TV. The studio with the most hits wins! In TV, they had mostly the same strategy: own a broadcast channel, some cable networks and an in-house production company. Whoever makes the most popular TV shows wins. And if you got some Emmy nominations or wins, even better!



When Netflix pushed everyone into the streaming era in the 2010s, those strategies fell by the wayside. Every traditional studio had to figure out how to disrupt their own business models. Everyone had to get into streaming. And no two streamers picked the same way to do it. That makes for fun analysis!

That said, maybe Iโ€™m being too generous. Until last Thursday, August 4, we didnโ€™t really have a different vision for streaming. Prime Video, Disney+, Apple TV+, HBO Max, Paramount+ and Peacock all launched headlong into streaming, but mostly copied Netflixโ€™ playbook. Essentially, weโ€™re coming after Netflix, but due to our legacy and library content weโ€™ll do it better. (The assumption always that streaming was the future…) Or in Prime Video and Appleโ€™s cases, they can just spend all the monies.

David Zaslav grabbed the mic last week to say, โ€œNot so fast.โ€

This has been a preview of todayโ€™s Ankler. To read the full article, we invite you to become a paid subscriber to The Ankler and donโ€™t miss a single beat of our analysis, stories or podcasts.


Related Stories