Interesting how she kept referencing “AI genre” as its own thing yet we get no definition of what that actually means. So we’ll have AI movies in theatres competing with human made movies for box office sales? or AI streaming movies trending against human movies? It’s not enough that most of social media is flooded with AI generated content, it’s going to be “additive” having AI as its own genre in mainstream entertainment?
There is no situation in which financially this technology doesn’t impact human labor negatively.
Let’s take the example given, an actor does a commercial digitally while they’re filming a movie. What that’s that look like in reality? Well no crew on set for the digital commercial, no hair and make up or wardrobe team, no production team arranging the location, logistics ect. All that cost will essentially be funneled to some AI company that will make it all. It’s basically transferring the economics of storytelling from human labor to technology. It’s inevitable, but let’s not pretend like this shift is all kumbaya. The moment companies see they can make things cheaper and still make as much money let’s not pretend that people wont lose jobs while technology “production” companies rake in.
10 years she had a production company and what does she have to show for it? Nothing. So here goes yet another hack that couldn’t make it and has jumped into this grifter bandwagon. Good lord.
Seems like the only folks talking positively about AI are the ones making it and chasing a profit... A couple months ago, this developer Van der Velden was touting that Hollywood Talent agencies were beating down her door to get to Trisha Norwood, but now Van der Velden claims that she "hopes" her creation gets repped by an agency... So like, which is it?
This is all hype, it's all a bubble. Translation, it's all sales & BS.
If you take away the novelty of an AI actress, you're left with something nobody asked for, or cares about. I find this utterly underwhelming.
On Tik Tok the actress that they based Tilly Norwood off of has already come forward and expressed her dissatisfaction. Are they planning on paying her?
It's incredible how naive this woman is - so obviously does not understand anything about the business of Hollywood, or business in general. The profit motive which exerts intense downwards pressure on costs will make using AI actors in film and television a necessity, not a choice. I also find thin gruel her suggestion that prompts are IP when compared to the effort (and expenditure) that went in to creating the video the models use for training.
I’ve been screaming about how amazing Ai is since 2018. Look it up.
And even now, I am utterly shocked that more creators are fighting it instead of grabbing opportunities since the audience is bigger than ever, hungrier than ever and more bored than ever.
Ai content is entertaining and gets better every day.
We are working on a few Ai apps that literally monitor the viewer with their consent, and adapt the story to their emotional needs.
How can you be against something the audience wants and admires and misses?
Interesting how she kept referencing “AI genre” as its own thing yet we get no definition of what that actually means. So we’ll have AI movies in theatres competing with human made movies for box office sales? or AI streaming movies trending against human movies? It’s not enough that most of social media is flooded with AI generated content, it’s going to be “additive” having AI as its own genre in mainstream entertainment?
There is no situation in which financially this technology doesn’t impact human labor negatively.
Let’s take the example given, an actor does a commercial digitally while they’re filming a movie. What that’s that look like in reality? Well no crew on set for the digital commercial, no hair and make up or wardrobe team, no production team arranging the location, logistics ect. All that cost will essentially be funneled to some AI company that will make it all. It’s basically transferring the economics of storytelling from human labor to technology. It’s inevitable, but let’s not pretend like this shift is all kumbaya. The moment companies see they can make things cheaper and still make as much money let’s not pretend that people wont lose jobs while technology “production” companies rake in.
10 years she had a production company and what does she have to show for it? Nothing. So here goes yet another hack that couldn’t make it and has jumped into this grifter bandwagon. Good lord.
Seems like the only folks talking positively about AI are the ones making it and chasing a profit... A couple months ago, this developer Van der Velden was touting that Hollywood Talent agencies were beating down her door to get to Trisha Norwood, but now Van der Velden claims that she "hopes" her creation gets repped by an agency... So like, which is it?
This is all hype, it's all a bubble. Translation, it's all sales & BS.
If you take away the novelty of an AI actress, you're left with something nobody asked for, or cares about. I find this utterly underwhelming.
On Tik Tok the actress that they based Tilly Norwood off of has already come forward and expressed her dissatisfaction. Are they planning on paying her?
It's incredible how naive this woman is - so obviously does not understand anything about the business of Hollywood, or business in general. The profit motive which exerts intense downwards pressure on costs will make using AI actors in film and television a necessity, not a choice. I also find thin gruel her suggestion that prompts are IP when compared to the effort (and expenditure) that went in to creating the video the models use for training.
I’ve been screaming about how amazing Ai is since 2018. Look it up.
And even now, I am utterly shocked that more creators are fighting it instead of grabbing opportunities since the audience is bigger than ever, hungrier than ever and more bored than ever.
Ai content is entertaining and gets better every day.
We are working on a few Ai apps that literally monitor the viewer with their consent, and adapt the story to their emotional needs.
How can you be against something the audience wants and admires and misses?
We are here to entertain.