How Much AI Will Audiences Accept in Movies and Music? Here Are the Poll Answers
A clear line is drawn as 2026 becomes make-or-break for the technology
Daniel Parris is a data journalist, pop culture lover, data and analytics consultant and former senior leader at DoorDash who writes Stat Significant. He recently wrote about why Avatar films leave a small cultural footprint despite their box office success.
Time magazine’s Person of the Year for 2025 was “The Architects of AI,” a nebulous cohort of tech executives whose selection underscores the technology’s inescapability. If 2023 and 2024 introduced everyday consumers to the novelty and promise of generative artificial intelligence, 2025 marked a turning point where its drastic economic consequences became unavoidable:
Chegg laid off nearly half its workforce as generative AI tools disrupted its core homework-help business.
Just Eat Takeaway, formerly the owner of Grubhub, cut 450 corporate roles, citing AI-driven automation across customer service and sales.
Gannett, publisher of USA Today and hundreds of local papers, announced a $100 million cost-reduction program while simultaneously expanding AI-written recaps and summaries.
AI disruption proliferated across media and entertainment, but no story commanded greater trade press attention than Tilly Norwood.
For those who need a refresher: Tilly Norwood is an AI-generated “actress” created by a British startup called Particle6. In September 2025, reports emerged that Hollywood talent agencies were scouting this large language model output as if she were a real performer. These claims were dubious, given that no credible agency would sign such a client at the expense of alienating its stable real human actors, but that didn’t stop a deluge of half-baked think pieces about the end of human performance as we know it.
Related:
The machine intelligence known as “Tilly” represents an extreme example of AI-driven job displacement in entertainment. If you imagine a spectrum of what viewers will accept, AI actors would likely fall at the very end — precisely because of the parasocial bonds we form with Julia Roberts, Tom Hanks or Timothée Chalamet.
But the introduction of “Tilly” crystallized anxieties about how AI might reshape the filmmaking process. If 2025 was the year that AI first infiltrated movie production, then 2026 will bring much thornier questions. How much automation is too much? When are audiences willing to tolerate AI-generated elements — and where do they draw the line in the uncanny valley?
The debate over AI in entertainment isn’t abstract anymore. As its economic and creative consequences become harder to ignore, the public is already signaling what it will — and won’t — accept.
Here’s what the data (adapted from my Substack Stat Significant) and the early backlash already make clear:
The surprising number of people who say they support AI art — and what changes when surveys probe how it’s used
How audiences distinguish between AI that supports artists and AI that replaces them
Which elements of filmmaking and music viewers already tolerate being automated (often without realizing it)
How ideas of authorship are shifting — without disappearing — in the age of generative tools
A modest proposal to rebuild audience trust around artists’ use of AI
Why incremental, background uses of generative AI may matter more than headline-grabbing AI actors
‘Acceptable’ Use of AI in Art
 | A guest post by
|